The questionnaire contains 24 brief closed-ended and small unrestricted concerns, including background variables. The previous concerns accumulated information on knowledge of economic exchanges, volume and wide range of times, demographic history, including, like, sex, era, and sexual direction ( desk 1), motivations for sugar internet dating ( desk 2), and experience of offering or using companion service. Almost all were hoping to find heterosexual plans, although heterosexual desires was healthier among the male respondents (97 percentage) than among the female respondents (61 %). Even though the era maximum to register on the website is actually 18, ten percent of girls reported being more youthful than 18 (14a€“17) (see dining table 1, Figure 1 and Figure 2). 6 The unrestricted questions dealt with the definitions and reasons around sugar matchmaking. The interviews and the study are performed in Swedish. Gunnarsson translated data become cited into English.

Analysis

Both interview additionally the survey facts happened to be reviewed qualitatively. Although the meeting data provided extra depth, the survey facts granted breadth. Some dimensions of the research data are examined quantitatively, for example, years, sex, and intimate direction. Interview transcriptions and qualitative research reactions were prepared in NVivo through a variety of data-driven and concept-driven coding. The challenge of just how to classify glucose matchmaking (especially with regards to prostitution) and the dilemma of instrumental vs. intrinsic motivations comprise conceptually input the programming process. Analytic memo publishing was used to document habits and fascinating motifs during coding and a far more holistic studying associated with the information. Based on the observation that the product displayed a multitude of tactics and encounters, we sought after a means of categorizing these variants. They became obvious that the knowledge wouldn’t differ along a unitary axis, therefore, without dividing them into one set of categories (cf. Scull 2020), we decided to focus the analysis around three crucial proportions that emerged as the most decisive organizers of the differentiations: (1) The functional contents of glucose matchmaking agreements: precisely what do sugar daters manage collectively? (2) The kinds of settlement engaging: How were a€?babiesa€? paid? and (3) a€?Babies’a€? inspirational grounds for sugar online dating: from what level create they participate in the arrangement because of the content benefits or since they enjoyed the actions in as well as on their own? From inside the next, the interview and research information are assessed jointly with respect to different types of sugar dating regarding each differentiating measurement. Whenever possible, rates are given concerning the regularity of each and every category among participants. Notice, though, the figures are not fundamentally representative regarding the wider people of sugar daters, hence individuals often may not be nicely divided into groups, since many have actually a selection of various activities and the issues driving the information generation weren’t made to fit this particular article’s logical sizes.

SUCCESS

One adultspace measurement central for differentiating between kinds of glucose internet dating issues the functional content for the sugar online dating arrangement. The carrying out of sugar online dating can be separated into three groups. In the first classification, we discover only sexual transaction; inside the next, a€?babiesa€? and a€?daddiesa€? tend to be engaged in a far more comprehensive dating arrangement including intercourse but other pursuits; for the 3rd, the parties mingle in a dating-like manner, but gender is certainly not the main plan.

Sex Best

Half the a€?babya€? interviewees (7 of 15) plus one a€?daddya€? interviewee (1 of 9) equated glucose online dating possibly with the straightforward selling and buying of gender, or reported using glucose internet dating sites for this specific purpose, because the best way of employing this site or as you way among others. During the review answers, 13 per cent of a€?babya€? respondents and 3 percentage of a€?daddya€? participants unambiguously equated sugar online dating with prostitution or selling/buying gender. Whenever asked about advantages of glucose matchmaking in comparison to other styles of matchmaking, one review respondent stated, a€?It’s not a type of matchmaking [smiley]; you offer and buy sexa€? (a€?baby,a€? 28). A recurrent motif during the content usually glucose matchmaking are a glossy address for prostitution, as articulated by another study respondent: a€?This are prostitution. We’re into self-deception. Nobody of us wants to name our selves hooker or john. Therefore we changed what and founded it in a nicer packagea€? (a€?baby,a€? 25). This crude consciousness about a€?the true naturea€? of glucose online dating contrasts with all the focus of earlier data on what glucose daters often delimit their work from prostitution and intercourse jobs ( Chu and Laidler 2016; Nayar 2017) and could become connected with Swedish news, in which glucose dating as a cover for prostitution happens to be a recurring theme ( Olsson 2019; Svenska Dagbladet 2017).